Wisconsin Supreme Court to Hear Lame-Duck Arguments
One Wisconsin [Institute] won a victory in January, convincing U.S. District Judge James Peterson to block the early-voting restrictions.
One Wisconsin [Institute] won a victory in January, convincing U.S. District Judge James Peterson to block the early-voting restrictions.
Badger State liberals did see a win in another federal lawsuit brought by One Wisconsin Institute.
A judge in January ruled against Republicans in a challenge from One Wisconsin Institute.
The original case the lame-duck grievance was filed under is still awaiting a decision by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.
[One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the early-voting restrictions in federal court in December.
In the second federal lawsuit filed by One Wisconsin Institute... [James Peterson] blocked early-voting limits.
In one of the suits, filed by One Wisconsin Institute [a judge] blocked early-voting limits contained in the lame-duck bills.
[One Wisconsin Institute] persuaded U.S. District Judge James Peterson ... to strike down the limits on early in-person voting.
One Wisconsin Institute... asked U.S. District Judge James Peterson to enforce his earlier [early voting] decision.
Early and absentee voting in the April 2019 election has reached record levels for a non-presidential primary Spring election.
[One Wisconsin Institute] convinced U.S. District Judge James Peterson to block the early voting restrictions in January of this year.
A federal judge ruled in January in favor of One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin in a challenge...
[One Wisconsin Institute] convinced U.S. District Judge James Peterson to block the early voting restrictions in January of this year.
A federal judge ruled in favor of One Wisconsin Institute ... in a challenge against the provisions of the extraordinary session laws
Liberal advocacy group [One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the law’s early-voting restrictions in federal court.
One Wisconsin [Institute] has sought to overturn the provisions of the lame-duck law that curtailed access to early voting.
A conglomerate of labor union groups, the One Wisconsin Institute ... and three groups ... filed three separate lawsuits.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
[One Wisconsin Institute persuaded a judge] to strike down sections of the lame-duck law that restricted early voting.
[One Wisconsin Institute’s] challenge against reducing early voting was struck down by U.S. District Judge James Peterson..
[One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the early voting restrictions in federal court last month.
Liberal advocacy group One Wisconsin Now challenged the early-voting restrictions in federal court in December.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
Filing were One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund, progressive advocacy groups.
We speak with Analiese Eicher, program director at One Wisconsin Now, one of the organizations that filed the court challenge.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
In this case, brought by ... One Wisconsin Institute, Judge James Peterson ruled that the laws violated a 2016 court order.
The lawsuit brought by [One Wisconsin Institute] ... argued the changes were very similar to a previous law the courts struck down
One Wisconsin Institute went to court to ask Peterson to quash the newly approved restrictions.
National Redistricting Foundation provided support for the challenge to the new law that was brought by the One Wisconsin Institute.
Analiese Eicher of One Wisconsin said she remained confident Republicans attempt would suppress voting rights.
It's time for Robin Vos and the GOP to accept the court’s decisive and unmistakable ruling and cease their attacks on voting rights.
Citizens Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute brought the laws to court for Peterson to rule.
The suit was filed by One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
The lawsuit was brought by One Wisconsin Institute, Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
That lawsuit was brought by two liberal groups — One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund.
Analiese Eicher of [One Wisconsin Institute] said she remained confident Republicans attempt would suppress voting rights.
Analiese Eicher, program director at [One Wisconsin Institute], lauded Peterson's decision as a victory for Wisconsin voters.
[Josh Kaul] helped bring the original lawsuit challenging the state's voting laws as a lawyer for One Wisconsin Institute.
In addition to the new lawsuit, liberal group One Wisconsin Institute is asking a federal judge to strike down provisions passed in the session that curtail the timeline for early voting.
‘Attempts to Rig the Rules on Voting and Suppress Legal Voters Were Unconstitutional in 2016 and They Remain Unconstitutional Today’
One Wisconsin [Institute], an issue advocacy organization, has challenged this law in federal court.
Also now Wisconsin law is a statewide two-week limit on early voting, which has already been challenged in court by liberal advocacy group One Wisconsin Institute.
Scot Ross: One Wisconsin Now safeguarding early voting.
One Wisconsin Now and its companion organization One Wisconsin Institute are suing the state over changes to early voting laws.
An organization known as One Wisconsin Institute ... has already announced a lawsuit against the legislation.
Republicans have time and again sought to rig the rules on voting to give themselves an unfair advantage.