Tony Evers Orders DOT to Develop Plan to Make Voter ID Documents More Accessible
In a challenge brought by One Wisconsin Institute ... Judge James Peterson in 2016 found ... voting changes unconstitutional.
In a challenge brought by One Wisconsin Institute ... Judge James Peterson in 2016 found ... voting changes unconstitutional.
One Wisconsin [Institute] has sought to overturn the provisions of the lame-duck law that curtailed access to early voting.
A conglomerate of labor union groups, the One Wisconsin Institute ... and three groups ... filed three separate lawsuits.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
[One Wisconsin Institute’s] challenge against reducing early voting was struck down by U.S. District Judge James Peterson..
[One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the early voting restrictions in federal court last month.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
Filing were One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund, progressive advocacy groups.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
In this case, brought by ... One Wisconsin Institute, Judge James Peterson ruled that the laws violated a 2016 court order.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked U.S. District Judge James Peterson to halt those provisions of the extraordinary session laws.
The lawsuit brought by [One Wisconsin Institute] ... argued the changes were very similar to a previous law the courts struck down
One Wisconsin Institute went to court to ask Peterson to quash the newly approved restrictions.
National Redistricting Foundation provided support for the challenge to the new law that was brought by the One Wisconsin Institute.
Analiese Eicher of One Wisconsin said she remained confident Republicans attempt would suppress voting rights.
The suit was filed by One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
The lawsuit was brought by One Wisconsin Institute, Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
That lawsuit was brought by two liberal groups — One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund.
Analiese Eicher of [One Wisconsin Institute] said she remained confident Republicans attempt would suppress voting rights.
Analiese Eicher, program director at [One Wisconsin Institute], lauded Peterson's decision as a victory for Wisconsin voters.
Citizens Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute brought the laws to court for Peterson to rule.
According to a survey of 61,000 respondents conducted by One Wisconsin Institute, the average time to pay off student loan debt is 21.1 years.
[Josh Kaul] helped bring the original lawsuit challenging the state's voting laws as a lawyer for One Wisconsin Institute.
In addition to the new lawsuit, liberal group One Wisconsin Institute is asking a federal judge to strike down provisions passed in the session that curtail the timeline for early voting.
One Wisconsin [Institute], an issue advocacy organization, has challenged this law in federal court.
Also now Wisconsin law is a statewide two-week limit on early voting, which has already been challenged in court by liberal advocacy group One Wisconsin Institute.
He is clearly happy those laws will be challenged by the likes of the ACLU, One Wisconsin Institute and other respected groups that have announced such plans.
One Wisconsin Now and its companion organization One Wisconsin Institute are suing the state over changes to early voting laws.
An organization known as One Wisconsin Institute ... has already announced a lawsuit against the legislation.
One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action have already initiated the first legal action, returning to the federal district court that in 2016 struck down earlier limits on voting rights.
One Wisconsin Institute and others filed a memorandum asking U.S. District Judge James Peterson in Madison to enforce the court’s July 2016 injunction.