Evers Moves to Withdraw State From ACA Lawsuit After Judge Blocks Lame-duck Laws, Reviews Other Options
A federal judge ruled in January in favor of One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin in a challenge...
A federal judge ruled in January in favor of One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin in a challenge...
[One Wisconsin Institute] convinced U.S. District Judge James Peterson to block the early voting restrictions in January of this year.
A federal judge ruled in favor of One Wisconsin Institute ... in a challenge against the provisions of the extraordinary session laws
Liberal advocacy group [One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the law’s early-voting restrictions in federal court.
“The real fraud in our elections is when politicians manipulate the rules to give themselves an unfair advantage.”
We applaud Gov. Tony Evers’ leadership, taking Wisconsin in a new direction to help make voting easier and more convenient.
“Legal voters ... ought not be denied the right to have their voices heard in our elections because of bureaucratic roadblocks.”
In a challenge brought by One Wisconsin Institute ... Judge James Peterson in 2016 found ... voting changes unconstitutional.
Gov. Tony Evers includes important steps to address the $1.5 trillion-plus student loan debt crisis and protect voting rights.
One Wisconsin [Institute] has sought to overturn the provisions of the lame-duck law that curtailed access to early voting.
A conglomerate of labor union groups, the One Wisconsin Institute ... and three groups ... filed three separate lawsuits.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
[One Wisconsin Institute persuaded a judge] to strike down sections of the lame-duck law that restricted early voting.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked a federal judge to block a provision that limited early voting.
[One Wisconsin Institute’s] challenge against reducing early voting was struck down by U.S. District Judge James Peterson..
[One Wisconsin Institute] challenged the early voting restrictions in federal court last month.
Liberal advocacy group One Wisconsin Now challenged the early-voting restrictions in federal court in December.
Filing were One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund, progressive advocacy groups.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
In this case, brought by ... One Wisconsin Institute, Judge James Peterson ruled that the laws violated a 2016 court order.
We speak with Analiese Eicher, program director at One Wisconsin Now, one of the organizations that filed the court challenge.
One Wisconsin Institute ... asked U.S. District Judge James Peterson to halt those provisions of the extraordinary session laws.
The lawsuit brought by [One Wisconsin Institute] ... argued the changes were very similar to a previous law the courts struck down
One Wisconsin Institute went to court to ask Peterson to quash the newly approved restrictions.
National Redistricting Foundation provided support for the challenge to the new law that was brought by the One Wisconsin Institute.
Analiese Eicher of One Wisconsin said she remained confident Republicans attempt would suppress voting rights.
Citizens Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute brought the laws to court for Peterson to rule.
The suit was filed by One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
The lawsuit was brought by One Wisconsin Institute, Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund...
It's time for Robin Vos and the GOP to accept the court’s decisive and unmistakable ruling and cease their attacks on voting rights.
That lawsuit was brought by two liberal groups — One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund.